JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 12, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Amparo De Jesus Lopez Martinez Vs. Superintendencia De Salud

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Primero De Ejecucion De Penas Y De Medidas De Seguridad De La Dorada Caldas Y El Tribunal De Lo Contencioso Administrativo De Caldas. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Primero De Ejecucion De Penas Y De Medidas De Seguridad De La Dorada Caldas
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Superintendencia Nacional De Salud
  • Reclamo de incapacidad no reconocida por Saludcoop EPS
  • Conocimiento por juzgado de ejecución de penas y medidas de seguridad
Corte Constitucional
  • Remisión de expediente para que se de trámite a la acción de tutela
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Entidad del sector descentralizado por servicios del orden nacional
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
  • Aplicación Decreto 1382 de 2000
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitir, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado
  2. Primero. de Ejecucion de Penas y Medidas de Seguridad de la Dorada, Caldas, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, decida la accion de tutela de Amparo de Jesus Lopez Martinez contra la Superintendencia Nacional de Salud.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.